Wednesday, November 29, 2023

Eskom: The intelligence report | Carte Blanche | M-Net

The Ancient City Of Punt In Eritrea Confirmed ByMummified Baboons

 

DISCOVERIES

Location Found

A new DNA study from mummified baboons in ancient Egypt is helping scientists uncover a mysterious port city previously not found on any maps, Live Science reported.

Ancient Egyptians associated baboons with an underworld deity known as Babi, and the god of wisdom and magic, Thoth – who was sometimes depicted with the head of the animal.

They kept the animals in captivity and sometimes mummified them as offerings to the gods.

But baboons are not native to ancient Egypt and historical documents had suggested that the animals were traded from a land known as Punt.

In a 2020 paper, scientists analyzed the teeth of mummified baboons dating back to Egypt’s New Kingdom between 1550 and 1070 BCE. Their findings suggested that the animals originated from a region encompassing modern-day Somalia, Eritrea and Ethiopia – the first evidence of Punt.

Now, another research team extracted DNA from a mummified baboon dating to between 800 and 540 BCE. They then compared it with the genetics of 14 baboons from the 19th and 20th centuries whose origins were known.

The team wrote that the primate was most closely related to populations from modern-day coastal Eritrea. They explained that the area is close to the ancient port city of Adulis, suggesting that the baboon trade took place there.

“Maybe the earlier Punt was in a similar location to where Adulis was (later) established,” said lead author Gisela Kopp.

Kopp and her colleagues noted that the research only focused on one baboon, but hope that studies like this on other species could reveal more about other ancient Egyptian imports and their impact on wild populations.


Madagascar Has A Presidential Election

 

A Hard Pill

MADAGASCAR

Malagasy President Andry Rajoelina won Madagascar’s presidential election this month, a vote that was marked by low turnout, boycotting, and street protests from the opposition, Al Jazeera reported.

The country’s election body (CENI) announced Saturday that Rajoelina had secured a third term in office after winning nearly 59 percent of the vote.

Even so, other candidates decried the outcome, saying that the vote was marred by irregularities, such as intimidation of polling officials and use of public resources by the governing party. Voter turnout was 46.4 percent, which the opposition called the lowest one in Madagascar’s history.

Opposition lawmaker Siteny Randrianasoloniaiko – who came in second with more than 14 percent of the vote – filed two requests to the country’s highest court to cancel the election result and disqualify Rajoelina.

Thirteen candidates initially campaigned before the election, but only three participated in the Nov. 16 poll.

The other 10 opposition contenders – known as “le Collectif des 10” – urged voters not to participate in the polls and launched a series of demonstrations. The boycott came after CENI refused their request to postpone the vote so that the state could appoint independent officials to the electoral body.

The opposition also alleged that Rajoelina should not participate in the race because he acquired French nationality in 2014 – which they say automatically revokes his Malagasy one – and had created unfair election conditions.

It is now up to the constitutional court to confirm the final results within nine days of CENI’s announcement of the provisional results.

Rajoelina first came to power following a 2009 coup. Subsequently, he resigned after nearly five years as the head of a transitional authority, only to reclaim the presidency by winning the 2018 election.


Friday, November 24, 2023

South Africa: Oscar Pistorius Wins Parole From His 15 Year Muder Sentence! He Will Be released January 5, 2024.

 

Oscar Pistorius, Olympic Athlete Convicted of Murder, Will Be Released on Parole

The South African sprinter, who garnered global headlines after killing his girlfriend in 2013, will be released in January.

Oscar Pistorius in a dark suit walking through a dark room flanked by police officers.
Oscar Pistorius arriving at the Pretoria High Court in 2016. A parole board granted Mr. Pistorius’s petition on the basis that he had served half of his 15-year sentence.Credit...John Wessels/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Oscar Pistorius in a dark suit walking through a dark room flanked by police officers.

Oscar Pistorius, a once inspirational figure who gained international fame as an Olympic sprinter for South Africa before he was convicted of murdering his girlfriend, will be released on parole, the authorities said on Friday.

A parole board granted Mr. Pistorius’s petition on the basis that he had served half of his 15-year sentence he received for killing his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp, at his home a decade ago, making him eligible for parole according to South African law.

The Department of Correctional Services said in a statement that Mr. Pistorius was a “first-time offender, with a positive support system” and therefore met the requirements for parole, after a hearing at the Atteridgeville Correctional Center outside South Africa’s administrative capital, Pretoria.

Before his downfall, Mr. Pistorius was celebrated in South Africa and around the world as an athlete who had overcome personal adversity as a double amputee and fought for the right to compete in the Olympics, earning the nickname the Blade Runner for the carbon-fiber prosthetic blades that he used to race.

ADVERTISEMENT

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Mr. Pistorius, 37, will be released on Jan. 5, the statement said.

In March, the board denied Mr. Pistorius’s parole based on a technicality: The authorities had miscalculated whether he had served the minimum required period of detention, the Department of Correctional Services said at the time.

The calculation was based on a misunderstanding of when Mr. Pistorius’ sentence for murder began. Mr. Pistorius was initially convicted of manslaughter, but prosecutors appealed, and his conviction was upgraded to murder.

An appeals court increased his sentence from six years to 15 years in prison, the minimum recommended by South African law for unpremeditated murder.

Mr. Pistorius’s lawyers asked South Africa’s Constitutional Court, the highest decision-making body in the country, to rule on the parole matter. In October, the court ruled that Mr. Pistorius had served the minimum term and ordered correctional services to hear his parole petition.

The legal uncertainty recalls the complexities of Mr. Pistorius’s trial and eventual conviction for the killing of his girlfriend, Ms. Steenkamp, who was 29 at the time. Mr. Pistorius shot Ms. Steenkamp, a model, through a locked bathroom door in the predawn hours of Feb. 14 in 2013.

ADVERTISEMENT

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

He maintained that her death was an accident and that he had fired his gun in the belief that an intruder had entered his upscale home in a Pretoria security estate.

Image
A picture of Reeva Steenkamp wearing a necklace.
Mr. Pistorius was convicted for killing his girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp.Credit...Lucky Nxumalo/CITYPRESS, via Associated Press
A picture of Reeva Steenkamp wearing a necklace.

Prosecutors argued that Mr. Pistorius had killed Ms. Steenkamp on Valentine’s Day in a jealous rage after an argument. During the trial, they pointed to text messages in which Ms. Steenkamp said she was afraid of Mr. Pistorius’ temper as evidence of a volatile relationship between the couple.

As part of the parole-consideration process, the board heard from Ms. Steenkamp’s mother, June Steenkamp. During the March hearing, the Steenkamp family lobbied against Mr. Pistorius’s bid for freedom.

June Steenkamp did not attend the hearing, nor did she oppose parole for Mr. Pistorius, but she did question whether he had been rehabilitated. In a statement, she recalled evidence of Mr. Pistorius’s temper, including the text messages and testimonies from former partners.

ADVERTISEMENT

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

“I do not know to what extent his bad behavior still exists or were evident during his time of incarceration,’’ she said in a statement, read by Rob Matthews, a family friend whose daughter was also murdered by a partner, “but I’m concerned for the safety of any woman should this not have been addressed in his rehabilitation process.”

Ms. Steenkamp’s father, Barry Steenkamp, died in September at 80. In media interviews before his death, Mr. Steenkamp maintained that Mr. Pistorius had deliberately shot his daughter.

Mr. Pistorius had been celebrated as an inspirational figure. He was born without a fibula in either of his legs, the bone that runs between the knee and ankle, beside the tibia. His legs were amputated before his first birthday, and before his second birthday, he was walking on prosthetics.

By age 17, Mr. Pistorius had won gold medals in the 2004 Summer Paralympics in Athens. Despite continued wins in the Paralympics games, Mr. Pistorius was determined to compete against able-bodied athletes.

The world athletic body, the I.A.A.F., rejected his bid to compete in the 2008 Beijing Olympics, but, after winning an appeal, he later qualified for and was allowed to compete in the London Games.

ADVERTISEMENT

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

He ran the 400 meters at the 2012 Olympics in London, becoming the first double amputee to compete in the Olympic Games. The fact that he did not win any medals did little to diminish his global profile.

His success on the track also brought wealth and a degree of infamy: He earned more than $1 million in endorsements with major brands and made headlines for crashing his boat in 2008 and for his extravagant taste in pets (two African white tigers).

He also earned a spot on People Magazine’s sexiest athletes list, while he and Ms. Steenkamp regularly walked the red carpet in South Africa.

Lynsey Chutel covers Southern Africa from the Johannesburg bureau and also writes about Africa for The Times's international morning newsletters. She previously worked for Foreign Policy, Quartz and the Associated Press. More about Lynsey Chutel

Tuesday, November 21, 2023

South Africa-Kwazulu Natal Has A Big Election Next Year

 

Editor's notebook

ADRIAAN BASSON,
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

KwaZulu-Natal in 2024: Prepare for a cliffhanger election

Who will govern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa's second-richest and second-most populated province, after the 2024 provincial election?
 

Could the ANC lose the province it fought so hard to win again after 20 years of governing the Zulu Kingdom? Could this be the province where the Multi-Party Charter (MPC), courtesy of the IFP and the DA, rules the roost?
 

The latest polling results have suggested it will be a cliffhanger to decide who governs KwaZulu-Natal for the next five years, in next year's provincial election.
 

The DA, known for having the most sophisticated polling machinery of all the country's political parties, released results on the weekend, showing the ANC stuttering on 38% support in the province. This should cause provincial party leader Siboniso Duma and his comrades sleepless nights.
 

Duma has not been in the news for the right reasons since he took over the ANC chairpersonship in the province in July last year. 
 

Recently, President Cyril Ramaphosa had to intervene to stop Duma from splurging R20 million of the troubled province's budget on hosting the glitzy SA Music Awards.
 

Shortly after that, Duma was accused of sexism by the ANC Women's League after grabbing the Rugby World Cup, the Webb Ellis trophy, when it was supposed to be handed to Premier Nomusa Dube-Ncube during the Boks' victory parade in Durban.
 

But Duma may have more significant troubles ahead if he bothers to take note of the DA's poll. The same poll has both the IFP and DA on 22% each of the popular support in the province. Together with ActionSA and the ACDP, the MPC is polling at 47% in the province.
 

The DA/IFP match-up may prove to be a game-changer in KwaZulu-Natal. The two parties have signed a pact to cooperate in the province and don't contest each other in by-elections.
 

The DA has announced its energetic and popular uMngeni Municipality Mayor Chris Pappas as the party's premier candidate in the province. It is not the IFP's tradition to announce premier candidates, although it may be the largest partner in the MPC in the province. 
 

The DA's poll is echoed by the results of a similar poll by the Social Research Foundation (SRF) in KwaZulu-Natal in September. This survey estimated the ANC's support at between 37% and 41%, depending on turnout. The SRF polled the DA on about 21% and the IFP on 27%.
 

It looks abundantly clear now that KwaZulu-Natal, a province battered by the July 2021 riots, torrential floods, the collapse of road infrastructure and Transnet's incompetence, will be governed by a coalition government after next year's election.
 

This is not unknown territory for the province; IFP-ANC coalitions, in which the IFP was the largest partner and received the premiership, ruled the province after the 1994 and 1999 provincial elections.
 

In 2004, the ANC surpassed the IFP, scoring 47% of the provincial vote. The ANC gave the IFP three MEC positions, but the coalition fell apart when the IFP started cooperating with the DA in KwaZulu-Natal municipalities.
 

In the 2009 (63%), 2014 (65%) and 2019 (54%) provincial elections, the ANC managed to win outright. 2009 and 2014 were Zuma years; former president Jacob Zuma was the ANC's first Zulu-speaking leader in a democratic era and remains popular in his home province.
 

Zuma's ascendancy left the IFP limping with a pitiful 11% showing in 2014 (when the DA scored 13%). But Zuma's demise in the ANC and Ramaphosa's rise has chilled the ANC's support, with the party now polling around 40%, fourteen percentage points less than in 2019.
 

The Zuma factor is not the only one affecting KwaZulu-Natal voting patterns. The province has little to show for service delivery achievements over the past five years. When the province received R6 billion in relief funding in response to the April 2022 floods, it only spent R250 million, for which the Auditor-General scolded it.
 

Currently, the ANC's only path to governing KwaZulu-Natal is through a coalition with the EFF, which polls between 7% and 11%, according to the SRF and DA. Even then, the two will have to convince smaller parties to choose them over the DA/IFP option.
 

Both blocks – the ANC/EFF and the IFP/DA/ActionSA – are together polling just short of the magical 50% needed, meaning smaller parties like the National Freedom Party, ACDP and the FF Plus may play a significant role in determining who governs the province.

More on the topic