Tuesday, October 24, 2023

Who Will Rule South Africa In 2024?

 

Editor's notebook

ADRIAAN BASSON,
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

Road to 2024: Can the DA run Parliament?

One of the most fascinating discoveries my colleague Qaanitah Hunter made while researching our just-published book Who Will Rule South Africa? was that secret talks are under way between the ANC and the DA to form a coalition after the 2024 elections.
 

Apart from tangential comments by party members, nothing of substance has been forthcoming from these cloak-and-dagger discussions ahead of next year's crossroads poll.
 

Hunter uncovered that a fascinating proposal was apparently on the table; in exchange for the DA's support to keep the ANC in government, the governing party would hand over Parliament to the DA to run.
 

Both parties seem to think this is a deal they could sell to their supporters. Let's unpack what such a deal would entail.
 

Firstly, the newest elections poll, published last week by the Brenthurst Foundation, seems to cement two things that narrow the outcome of next year's vote: the ANC's support is very likely to dip below 50%, and the Multi-Party Charter (MPC), consisting of the DA, IFP, ActionSA, ACDP and smaller parties, is doubtful to reach 50% nationally.
 

Brenthurst, who polled 1 500 registered voters, has the ANC at 41% of the national vote, the DA at 23%, and the EFF at a whopping 17%. This means the remaining 19% will be split between the smaller parties.
 

Together, the MPC parties have 36%, and I cannot see how they will grow that to over 50% in the remaining seven months or so.
 

If the ANC's support drops to the low 40s, I see only three possible scenarios playing out, and all of them involve the ANC remaining the largest partner in a coalition government. I simply cannot see how the DA and EFF would work together to keep the ANC out of office.
 

DA leader John Steenhuisen has declared the EFF their "political enemy number one". There can only be one number one, which means the ANC is probably enemy number two.
 

The first scenario sees the ANC making a deal with all the smaller parties with seats in Parliament to meet the magical 201-seat threshold to elect the president in the National Assembly. This includes all the parties in the recently announced Super Pact (APC, Cope, AIC, NFP, AARM and ICM) plus the likes of Al Jama-ah and Gayton McKenzie's Patriotic Alliance.
 

This will require the ANC to offer all these small party leaders a piece of the Cabinet cake. However, the ANC has recent experience of how fragile such complicated arrangements are in Nelson Mandela Bay and Johannesburg and may want to avoid this for the sake of stability.
 

You are beholden to every whim of every small party leader who could bring the government down overnight.
 

The second scenario would be an ANC-EFF deal that would see the red berets elevated to Cabinet and senior government positions. There has already been talk of EFF leader Julius Malema positioning himself as deputy president to ANC deputy leader Paul Mashatile in an arrangement where President Cyril Ramaphosa is recalled for the ANC's poor performance.
 

This will be disastrous for the country and the economy, with the markets likely to tank overnight. Not only is Malema a criminally accused person, but his party proposes that all property belongs to the state, and they will undoubtedly demand policy changes of the ANC that would see capital and property owners fleeing.
 

The third and last scenario for the ANC is cutting a deal with their political nemesis, the DA. To be clear, neither party wants this. The ANC cannot stand the DA, its leadership and many policy positions, while the DA has been campaigning for years to unseat the ANC as the governing party, including many court cases that exposed the ANC's corruption and incompetence.
 

They are unlikely bedfellows, but someone must make the bed, and if it's not them, then who?
 

It is known that ANC leaders who support Ramaphosa would prefer a deal with the DA over the EFF. The ANC has learnt the hard way in Ekurhuleni and Johannesburg just how dishonest and sly the red berets are when you hand them power. And opening the door of government to the EFF will likely weaken the ANC further and ultimately diminish their support.
 

This brings me back to the apparent deal: the DA takes charge of oversight, meaning they elect the Speaker of Parliament, the chief whip and the chairs of portfolio committees. The ANC runs the executive but is now accountable to Parliament, which the DA now runs.
 

This is a creative and innovative solution to both parties' dilemma: how to sell such a deal to your supporters without being accused of selling out.
 

The ANC can tell its supporters they remain in charge of government policy to deliver services prioritised by the party's national conference. At the same time, the DA can say to its supporters they now have the power to expose ANC ministers not doing their jobs, calling them to account, ordering investigations through standing committees and rebuking poor-performing departments.
 

The legislative arm has enormous powers, and putting the DA in charge of oversight and accountability could strengthen our democracy. But don't expect either party to talk about this arrangement before the election; for the next seven months or so, they will say the nastiest things about each other to get your vote.
 


Wednesday, October 18, 2023

Who Will Be The New Leader Of The Zulu Nation In South Africa?

 

Royal Rumble

SOUTH AFRICA

A South African court began hearing a case this week over the leadership of the country’s influential Zulu nation, as factions within its royal family battle over who should be king of South Africa’s largest ethnic group, the Associated Press reported.

The case has pitted current King Misuzulu kaZwelithini against his half-brother, Prince Simakade Zulu, who believes he is entitled to the throne. It revolves around the traditional and legal processes used to designate the Zulu king, with Prince Simakade seeking to challenge President Cyril Ramaphosa’s recognition of Misuzulu’s legitimacy.

Misuzulu ascended the throne last year following the death of his father, King Goodwill Zwelithini, in 2021. The late king had six wives and a number of male heirs. He ruled for more than five decades, making him the longest-reigning Zulu monarch.

Following his death, Misuzulu’s mother, Queen Mantfombi, served as regent for a brief period before her own death. She designated her son as the next king in her will.

But Misuzulu’s ascension to the throne was also challenged last year.

During Tuesday’s proceedings, Ramaphosa’s lawyer said that the president’s issuance of the certificate recognizing Misuzulu as the heir resulted from consultations with the Zulu royal family, confirming his status as king.

Ramaphosa also relied on past court rulings that dismissed earlier legal challenges to Misuzulu’s ascent to the throne.

The proceedings are expected to continue Wednesday. Meanwhile, the decision will have profound implications for the future leadership of the Zulu nation.

The Zulu nation comprises around 12 million Zulu-speaking people and is known historically for resisting British colonialism in the 19th century.

The Zulu king is considered the most influential traditional leader in South Africa, with the royal house believed to control about 30 percent of the land in KwaZulu Natal province.

Tuesday, October 10, 2023

A Great South African Editorial On Israel

 

Editor's notebook

ADRIAAN BASSON,
EDITOR-IN-CHIEF

First Ukraine, now Israel: ANC's sickening depravity on show again

For a party that has portrayed itself as a moral force for peace and freedom, the ANC's inability to sympathise with the people of Israel for the brutal attack by Hamas again exposes the depravity of the governing party.
 

In a three-page carefully worded statement released by the ANC's spokesperson, Mahlengi Bhengu-Motsiri, on Sunday, the party could not find the courage to condemn the brutal attack by a terrorist organisation of innocent civilians, including women and children.
 

Instead, the ANC immediately blamed the "apartheid state" Israel for the attacks on its citizens.
 

And in a thinly veiled justification for the horrific bombings by Hamas, the ANC victim blamed Israel by saying, "the decision by Palestinians to respond to the brutality of the settler Israeli apartheid regime is unsurprising".
 

In other words, Israel, you got what you deserved.
 

Not once in the statement does the ANC condemn the violent actions of Hamas or sympathise with the hundreds of casualties suffered by innocent Israelis, many of whom were attending a music concert for peace when they were attacked, abducted, and slaughtered.
 

Does this mean there is no merit in assessing Israel's guilt over the years in creating an unsustainable, explosive future for the citizens of the Middle East? Absolutely not. There is much merit in calling Israel an apartheid state, and I will leave it to better-qualified historians to outline the historical background of this conflict.
 

But what has been on show here, again, as in the wake of Russia's unilateral invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, is the ANC's preference for shallow ideology over human rights. The party has genuinely and finally lost its moral compass.
 

Irrespective of how deep the party's ties go with the Palestinian authorities, a true moral force would have condemned both Hamas' attacks and Israel's subsequent retaliation, which also claimed the lives of hundreds, including women and children.
 

Instead of immediately choosing sides and denying the pain and suffering suffered by hundreds of Israelis, many of whom have family in South Africa, the ANC could have stood up for any innocent life lost by the three days' brutal attacks.
 

When the ANC turned to armed resistance during the struggle, the liberation movement was at pains to limit civilian injuries to the minimum.
 

Never in the history of uMkhonto weSizwe did the ANC's military wing launch attacks on apartheid South Africa at nearly the scale of what Hamas did on Saturday. But this was a different era when the ANC and its leaders still had a moral compass. 
 

The ANC rightly criticises Israel for the desecration of the al-Aqsa mosque in April, but completely ignores the thousands of rockets fired by Hamas, a designated terrorist organisation not supported by all Palestinians, into Israel since Saturday, and the hundreds of people who militants took hostage.
 

The ANC does not mention the Tribe of Nova music festival, close to the Gaza border, where more than 260 youngsters from all over the world were dancing and singing in the name of peace before being shot down by Hamas' rockets, bombs, and machine guns.
 

To the ANC, the name of Shani Louk means nothing. Shani, a German tourist, was among the thousands of people at the Tribe of Nova music festival before she was abducted by terrorists and assaulted to the point of unconsciousness.
 

Her naked, bloodied body was paraded on the back of a track through the streets of Gaza, with her mother only able to identify her by her leg tattoos.
 

The ANC's call for "all sides to seize the opportunity for peace as opposed to violence" rings hollow in the face of a one-sided statement that completely ignores the atrocities of Hamas, as it did and still does Russia's brutal attack on Ukraine.
 

Luckily, the ANC and the government they lead do not represent the views of all South Africans, and millions of us can say at once that Israel is by no means innocent in this age-old conflict, but that Hamas was the aggressor in Saturday's horrific assault that peace-loving citizens of the world should roundly condemn.